Korea Casino Association Warns of Bankruptcies from Proposed Tourism Levy Hike
Theo Keller · Jul 24, 2026

Korea Casino Association Warns of Bankruptcies from Proposed Tourism Levy Hike

The Korea Casino Association, which represents South Korea’s foreigner-only casino operators, issued a warning in July 2026 about a proposed increase in the maximum tourism levy from 10 percent to 15 percent of revenue along with additional regulatory adjustments including five-year license renewals. The group stated that these changes would accelerate bankruptcies for operators still recovering from the effects of COVID-19. Casinos in this category face a unique structure where levies apply to revenue regardless of profitability, and the association noted that roughly half of operators have recorded annual deficits over the past decade.
Details of the Proposed Changes
The proposed levy adjustment targets tourism-related contributions collected from casino revenues, while the shift to five-year license renewals introduces a new review cycle that replaces longer or less frequent terms. Operators argue that the combination raises fixed costs during a period when many properties continue to rebuild visitor numbers and stabilize cash flow after pandemic-related closures and travel restrictions. The Korea Casino Association highlighted that casinos remain subject to revenue-based levies even when operating at a loss, a mechanism that differs from standard corporate taxation applied to other tourism sectors.
Financial Performance and Contributions
Data from recent years shows the sector delivered record contributions of KRW219.5 billion in 2025, representing a 61.7 percent increase compared with 2019 levels. This figure reflects both higher visitor volumes in certain months and elevated spending per guest at foreigner-only facilities. Despite these contributions, the association pointed out that persistent deficits affect approximately half of the operators over a ten-year span, underscoring the volatility tied to tourism flows and currency fluctuations that influence international arrivals.
Observers note that the revenue levy structure creates pressure during low-margin periods, because payments continue irrespective of net results. The association’s statement connects this ongoing obligation to the risk of additional closures if the maximum rate rises to 15 percent. License renewal every five years adds administrative and compliance expenses that some smaller operators may struggle to absorb while simultaneously managing debt incurred during the pandemic recovery phase.

Industry Context and Recovery Efforts
Foreigners-only casinos in South Korea operate under strict regulatory frameworks that separate them from domestic gambling venues. The sector relies heavily on inbound tourism, which faced prolonged disruptions from 2020 through 2022. Recovery accelerated in 2023 and 2024 as international flight routes reopened and visa processes eased, yet many properties still carry elevated debt loads and face uneven demand across regions. The Korea Casino Association emphasized that the proposed changes arrive before full stabilization occurs.
Industry reports indicate that operators have invested in facility upgrades and marketing campaigns aimed at key source markets such as China, Japan, and Southeast Asia. These efforts produced the KRW219.5 billion contribution figure in 2025. The group warned that an increased levy would divert resources away from further capital improvements and staff retention programs necessary to maintain service standards expected by international visitors.
Regulatory and Economic Implications
Five-year license renewals introduce periodic evaluations that could require additional documentation and performance benchmarks. The Korea Casino Association stated that this cadence raises uncertainty for long-term planning, particularly for properties that require multi-year investment cycles to refresh gaming floors and hospitality offerings. Combined with the levy increase, these factors create a cumulative cost burden that smaller operators may not sustain without restructuring or closure.
According to industry data referenced by the association, roughly half of the represented operators posted deficits in multiple years during the preceding decade. This pattern reflects seasonal tourism variations and external shocks rather than operational inefficiency alone. The revenue-based levy continues during deficit years, reducing available capital for debt service and reinvestment at precisely the moments when reserves are already thin.
Stakeholder Responses
Local government bodies and tourism agencies continue to monitor the situation as the proposal moves through review stages. The Korea Casino Association has called for further analysis of the levy’s impact on employment and regional economies that depend on casino-related spending. Figures released for 2025 demonstrate that the sector’s contributions grew substantially from pre-pandemic baselines, yet the group maintains that sustained growth requires a stable fiscal environment during the remaining recovery period.
Conclusion
The Korea Casino Association’s July 2026 statement outlines specific risks tied to the proposed tourism levy increase and license renewal changes. The group’s data on past deficits, current contributions, and the revenue-based levy structure provides context for ongoing discussions between operators and regulators. As the proposal advances, stakeholders will examine how adjustments affect long-term viability for South Korea’s foreigner-only casino segment.